Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Jamie Moyer Comeback Leads to Nostalgic Thoughts

Jamie Moyer is 49 years old and is still attempting to make the Colorado Rockies' roster even after going through off-season Tommy John surgery. He pitched his first game way back in 1986 when some of the Rockies players were not even born yet but is still hoping to join those guys on the opening day roster. This offseason the Rockies have shipped out some of their farm grown talent for more established veteran players including Moyer. They are giving him a shot and hoping that he can drum up some of the pitching success he had when he was a bit younger. He is having a few setbacks in his attempt at a return to the Big Leagues but will continue to push through because that is the type of player he is.

This is all good and well but the Rockies are stretching a bit in hoping Moyer can have legitimate success at his age. It seems that Colorado is feeling a bit of nostalgia by bringing him in and were imagining some of his past pitching performances returning as he buttoned up his Rockies jersey. In the novel Underworld by Don DeLillo the main character Nick Shay often has nostalgic thoughts about the past and what he was thinking or feeling at the time. Nostalgic thoughts are not always positive thoughts but when it comes to the Rockies all they can afford to think when Moyer comes to mind is thinking positively. They don't want to think of the injuries he suffered in 2010 and 2011. They want to think of the Moyer that became the oldest pitcher to post a shutout and the pitcher that became only the third to win 100 games past the age of 40.

Whether Moyer will make the roster or not is yet to be seen. He is currently on a minor league contract with a spot in spring training available to him. He has not pitched that well in some of his outings so far this spring giving up 4 runs on 6 hits in less than two innings in his last appearance. Moyer has said that this year he will either take a step forward or a step backward into retirement based on his performance. Taking a step back will allow everyone to also look back and remember the good times that Moyer had as an MLB pitcher. Nostalgia will be rampant if he retires and that's never a bad thing.


Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Baseball and the American City- A's and San Jose


Talk surrounding the Oakland A's effort to relocate to San Jose have intensified over the past week with the A's releasing a statement about their intentions by moving to San Jose. The SF Giants have fought against the move saying that the relocation would encroach on their territorial rights in the SJ area. To rebuff the Giants wishes the A's released a statement making their case for the move. Their case states that moving to San Jose will not encroach on the Giants' minor league team located in the city, rather it will "move over 35 miles further away from the Giant's great venue and it will establish an exciting competition between the Giants and the A's." However, the Giants see this as move more from the standpoint of corporate dollars instead of just territorial rights. Moving an MLB franchise into the same city that a minor league team already inhabits will kill that teams revenue. There is the argument that a Giants fan will stay a Giants fan and still support the minor league team but I think that offering a more polished product will draw a lot of fans away. The move would also allow the A's to be less dependent on revenue sharing where they are currently located in Oakland.

This brings up the argument made in the Cambridge's Companion to Baseball, more specifically "Baseball and the American City". It brings up the argument of sharing a market between teams. When the Dodgers moved from Brooklyn to Los Angeles they did it with the thought that they wouldn't have to compete with another team for a market (Cambridge pg. 97). Although the Giants would not be competing directly with the A's for an MLB market, they will still have to be competing for their minor league squad's attention.

Is it the right move for the A's? It depends on what perspective you are taking.They need to get out of Oakland and a move to San Jose would revitalize the organization and attract a larger fan base by moving further away from San Francisco. They need an updated modern ballpark and San Jose can assist in making that happen so they can get away from the out-of-date Oakland Coliseum. If you're the Giants you want to vote against the move just because of corporate dollars supporting your minor league team. They don't want that to happen so they will continue to fight against it. In my opinion I think the best move for the MLB and for the A's is to move to SJ to get a new start. It's all about the fan support and in SJ they would receive a larger portion of the attention.

Thursday, March 1, 2012

What Makes a Hero?


In the Cambridge Companion to Baseball it suggests that the public wants to view the baseball players as wholesome "All-American" "Boy Scouts". But in reality that is not particularly possible.

With the announcement of the Ryan Braun drug test being thrown out it's hard to see any baseball players as "All-American". Before all of this happened Braun was one of the players that fans looked up to for winning the right way, having success the clean way. That's not the case now as details are being revealed on how the drug test was dismissed. It wasn't for the urine to be free of steroids, it was for a "mishandled collection process" of submitting the sample to the testers. It's hard to trust any player now that may post similar numbers in the future and that's unfair to the players who are actually clean and play the right way.

ESPN's Buster Olney talked to dozen's of players about the subject and pretty much all of them disagree with the decision that was made. Furthermore, they are mad at how the appeal challenged the process of submission and not the actual substance of the drug test. His appeal spits in the face of the process and basically screams "GUILTY" but you submitted it wrong so I get off scott free. It throws off the whole balance of the testing for steroids and the players sincerely want the process to be effective in punishing the guys who cheat to get ahead.

It's a shame that this has to be a subject of conversation but it has to be discussed. The players don't like it, the managers don't like it and the commissioner especially doesn't like it because it holds a cloud over the sport. One of the worst parts about this whole thing was that Braun was recently crown NL MVP! If anybody else has his numbers in the future, it's going to be in the back of the fans' mind that the player is possibly on steroids. That's not fair but it will be the truth.

All that can happen now is that the MLB change the ruling in order to avoid this fiasco down the road. Like it or not, Braun got let off the hook on a technicality but it's just like a crime case being thrown out because of an improper warrant, it's the rules.

In my opinion, baseball took a huge black eye for this just like the justice system does when a case is thrown out due to a technicality. Commissioner Bud Selig is furious with the ruling because it makes the sport of baseball look bad and the drug testing system vulnerable to successful appeals based on technicalities. Baseball was just moving past the Barry Bonds era and the steroid issue looked to be shrinking but now it's thrown right back into the forefront.